Aramis Ramirez is due back maybe as early as the Atlanta series next week. This almost has to provide a lift. Prior to tonight’s game, the Cubs’ 3rd basemen were hitting .260/.336/.426 cumulatively, with 10 HR. In only 66 PA, Ramirez accounted for four of those home runs and a .364/.417/.591 line. And, although this is probably not meaningful, the Cubs are 11-7 in games Ramirez plays this season and 25-30 without him.
Monthly Archives: June 2009
I saw this linked at Baseball Musings, but on the off chance anyone is reading here who doesn’t read there, I wanted to share it. Flip Flop Fly Ball has the most amazing graphs about baseball. This one, showing the flight paths the Kansas City Royals will be taking this season, is probably my favorite.
I caught a little of both the Score and ESPN 1000 prior to the Cubs game that didn’t actually happen tonight. Two things stood out.
On ESPN 1000, they were talking about the revelation that Sammy Sosa had a positive drug test in 2003. John Jurkovich was all over the issue, in a good way. His reaction was basically “So what?” Nobody is surprised by this. Sammy was far from the only person who did it, and as Jurko pointed out, it’s a joke that Sammy and Barry Bonds and Mark McGwire and even Pete Rose are being kept out of or will be kept out of the Hall of Fame. So I have to give him credit for his take on that issue – I think it’s exactly right.
Then there was the Score. They seemed to have their morning guys doing the pregame for the Cubs/Sox game. Brian Hanley was complaining about the Cubs lineup, and how Milton Bradley and Alfonso Soriano were in it even though it was a cool, wet night. He pointed out that Soriano hasn’t been given a day off in a few weeks, and that given the weather, Bradley was an injury risk. He also pointed out that Lou said he was going to try to rest players more this season. But Hanley failed to consider that a) the Cubs have had the last few Mondays off, so the players have been getting rest every week, and b) the Cubs actually had yesterday off. Hanley also, in the same bit, criticized Piniella for the lineup he ran out against Tim Lincecum and the Giants where most of the Cubs starters got the day off at the same time. So, to recap – Hanley wants Piniella to rest his good players against the Sox, but he will criticize him if he rests his good players. I think maybe Hanley just wants to to rip Piniella no matter what he does.
Milton Bradley found a voice of support in the media today. Frank Thomas is helping to cover the Cubs/Sox interleague series for Comcast SportsNet, and he offered this:
“I think Milton is a great teammate,” he said of Bradley, who played with Thomas in Oakland. “He’s very passionate and loves to play the game. But sometimes he has things that happen.” That was a reference to Bradley’s emotional outbursts and, more recently, his gaffe Friday in the eighth inning against Minnesota when he threw the ball into the bleachers with only two outs.
“We called him T.O. [for controversial NFL star Terrell Owens] in Oakland and he loved it,” Thomas said. “You give him his space and he’ll produce.” Thomas said when he learned Bradley was signing with the Cubs, “to be honest, I felt at first he’d have problems with the media because the intensity is different from Oakland or Texas or even L.A.
“But it’s early,” Thomas said, predicting Bradley will be a significant contributor for the Cubs in the second half. “Milton shows up in the second half. We wouldn’t have gotten to the playoffs in Oakland [in 2006] without him. Don’t be too quick to judge Milton Bradley. The guy has a flare for the dramatic. He was a teammate of mine and I thoroughly enjoyed playing with him.”
I’ve always liked Frank Thomas, and I felt sort of like Sox fans and the media in this town didn’t deserve him sometimes. Thomas knows about Bradley and knows about the problems the Chicago media can cause a player.
Thomas’s situation is somewhat unique in that I can’t remember any sort of legitimate grievance against him at all. Milton Bradley is getting picked on in the media, sure, but he went after an umpire, even if the whole story is more complicated than that. Sammy Sosa got attacked in the media when he left, but he really did use a corked bat in a game. I don’t agree with the media’s treatment of them, but at least they use real, unfortunate events as a flimsy justification for their personal vendettas.
I’m not a Sox fan and I never followed the coverage of Thomas that closely, but I honestly feel like the media here basically went after him solely because he didn’t like dealing with them. He was an amazing player and I don’t remember hearing about a ton of on- or off-field incidents with him. So there’s a player who was just singled out because he wasn’t nice to the media. I’m glad he’s in Bradley’s corner, but I’m sure we’re just hours away from a columnist calling them peas in a pod and writing about how this shows that Bradley is somehow a bad guy.
After today’s game I imagine that a lot of Cubs blogs are spewing a lot of vitriol towards the team and, in particular, Milton Bradley. I don’t blame them, and I definitely made some comments over at Another Cubs Blog out of frustration, myself. But there are going to definitely be personal attacks on him, and I imagine he’s going to hear some incredibly vile stuff from the bleacher crowd tomorrow. I try to stay away personal attacks, even when I attack a player’s performance. I suggested that Aaron Miles should lose his job in my piece at Mouthpiece Sports today. But I try not to get too worked up by the fact that he’s on the team, and I try to remember his performance on the field is separate from his character. Why? Because of Mister Rogers.
There was a phenomenal article in Esquire magazine about Mister Rogers a decade ago. I didn’t read it until much more recently, but it’s available here, online. The author really goes out of his way to establish what an amazingly decent person Mister Rogers was, and a particular part of the article stands out in my memory:
Mister Rogers always worries about things like that, because he always worries about children, and when his station wagon stopped in traffic next to a bus stop, he read aloud the advertisement of an airline trying to push its international service. “Hmmm,” Mister Rogers said, “that’s a strange ad. `Most people think of us as a great domestic airline. We hate that.’ Hmmm. Hate is such a strong word to use so lightly. If they can hate something like that, you wonder how easy it would be for them to hate something more important.”
I’m frustrated by this Cubs team. They were supposed to leave the rest of the division in the dust. Instead they’re scuffling at .500 and the offense is pathetic. But I always think of this when I get too worked up. I wonder if I can get that upset at a baseball team, how easy would it be for me to get upset over something more important?
And that’s the thing about a lot of Cubs bloggers and commenters out there, too, and a lot of professional writers. They’ll criticize the players’ play, but they also attack them personally. Carlos Zambrano and Milton Bradley are “headcases.” Aramis Ramirez has been accused of dogging it I don’t know how many times. Geovany Soto put on a few pounds, so he must be lazy. If it’s that easy for these people to decide they dislike the personality and work ethic of people they’ve never met, how easy is it for them to do it when it’s something more important?
The bottom line is that Bradley had a bad game today. He lost a ball in the sun, which may or may not be his fault. He lost track of the number of outs and threw the ball into the stands. That’s definitely his fault. He ran into an out, and that’s also definitely his fault. People are absolutely right to criticize his performance today, and this season. He’s not hitting nearly as well as he should, and public criticism is definitely something that comes with playing major league baseball. But there’s no reason to extend it to attacks on character or to just downright hateful comments, and yet that’s what fans and some writers seem to want to subject these guys do. Me? I’m just trying to remember Mister Rogers.
I was reading a political blog, Ezra Klein’s over at the Washington Post, earlier today, and I noticed him describing a phenomenon that applies to sports as well. I’m loathe to bring up politics here, because I’m not really interested in debating them, so suffice it to say I just want to share the analogy.
Basically, political reporting on the Obama cabinet’s economic plans had spent an inordinate amount of time on Larry Summers’ personality and whether the people he’s working with like him. But Klein points out that that’s a silly way to report:
Imagine two worlds. In both worlds, the Obama administration pursues the exact same economic policy. But in one world, an external oil shock sends the price of energy hurtling skyward, which retards recovery. Voters feel economically stressed, and Democrats lose seats in the 2010 election. In the other world, the price of oil rises more gradually, the economy seems like it’s gradually improving, and Democrats either hold the line or gain a couple of seats.
In the first world, you’re going to read a lot of stories about how Larry Summers was a meanie who rendered the economic team dysfunctional and impeded the Obama administration’s efforts to revive the economy. In the other, you’re going to read a lot of stories about how the famously prickly Larry Summers managed to keep his ego in check and leverage his considerable brilliance to help the Obama administration save the American economy. But the relevant variable was not Summers — it was the oil shock.
A commenter there makes the same point I’m about to – this is the same thing that goes on in sports reporting and among fans. A player can be trying to do everything right but go through a slump, but reporters feel the need to blame it on something. Sometimes it’s just bad luck. But right now while the Cubs are scuffling, we get a lot of reporting about Carlos Zambrano’s personality and whatnot. If the team gets on a hot streak, expect to hear about extra time in the batting cage or how they all came together around some event or something, even though the relevant variable may very well not be anything that happens off the field.
Carlos Zambrano said after winning his 100th game last night that he’s going to retire at the end of his contract. Why? “You know how many Mother’s Days I haven’t spent with my mother? Twelve. You know how many things I’ve been [missing] in my life? It’s good to be here, it’s good to play baseball. But in five years. … I will retire.”
So he would like to spend time with his family. You’d think that was laudable. Obviously you’ve never spent time in the Tribune comments section! According to “GA Cubs Fan,” you’d be wrong:
And Carlos, PLEASE stop talking. All of us miss important times due to work and other committments, all while earning a HECK of a lot less than you. I hope medical people and emergency workers are working should you need them during “special times”.
You see, if you make a lot of money you should love your mom less. Maybe, GA Cubs Fan, Carlos thinks his job isn’t as important as being a doctor or a firefighter? I don’t know, chew on that for a little.
“One Eye Covered,” though, knows that missing 12 mother’s days isn’t a big deal:
Missed 12 mothers day? Come on. Something tells me she doesnt mind. I wish this guy would just shut up and pitch. Before, during and after the game. Just zip it.
Perhaps this commenter has great insight into whether Carlos’s mom would like to spend mother’s days with him. I have some doubts.
Finally, there’s this gem from John Anthony of Dixon, Missouri:
Good, please go. That would make it one less bum who speaks broken English. Eat another cheeseburger and get outta the country. Go back to where you belong!
John hates foreigners! They’re always coming to this country and taking jobs that hardworking Americans can do, like throwing 95 mile-per-hour fastballs and hitting home runs!
Bad news, John. Carlos is staying when he retires.